Here’s How We Could Build A Death Star, According To NASA

http://www.iflscience.com/sites/www.iflscience.com/files/styles/ifls_large/public/blog/%5Bnid%5D/o-DEATH-STAR-PETITION-facebook_0.jpg?itok=n85qfsRy
http://www.scienceofwonder.org/heres-how-we-could-build-a-death-star-according-to-nasa/

For all youboys and girls who dream ofone dayrulingthe galaxy with a tremendous weapon of mass destruction, NASA has some suggestions for you. The trick is to mine asteroids and use the material to construct the Death Star directly in space.

In a video on Wired, Brian Muirhead, chief engineer at NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory, illustrates how the Asteroid Redirect Mission will look at the feasibility of asteroid mining, and although the missiondoesnt exactly show you how to build a Death Star, it will dosomething nobody has done before. In 2023, a probe will capturea boulder and carry it intolunar orbit, where a group of astronauts will later visitto mine some of the asteroid material.

But is Muirhead right about using asteroids? Could we start building a mega structurearound Earth in 2016? Let’s take a quick look at the calculations involved.

According to Wookieepedia, the first Death Star has a radius of 60 kilometers (37 miles), which corresponds to a volume of about 904,000 cubic kilometers (217,000 cubic miles). Finding the mass of such an object is quite difficult, as we dont exactly know the internal structure, the building materials used, etc.

To simplify this problem, we imagined that the Death Star would be built similarly to an aircraft carrier, so we used the USS Ranger,which has a density of 210 kilograms (460 pounds)per cubic meter. This gives us a mass of 190 trillion tonnes (187 trillion US tons).

//player.cnevids.com/embedjs/5176e89e68f9daff42000013/video/56659ef0ff2afb65a6000000.js

Above, Wired’s interview withMuirhead.

Now, a medium-small asteroid is on paper the perfect candidate: It is about the right mass and it isrich in iron and carbon (to make steel), as well as other material that can be used in the construction. But is it cheaper mining the material on Earth and sending it to space, or to directly mine asteroids?

Sending stuff into space costs about $20,000 (13,000) per kilogram, so assembling the Death Star would cost us $40,000 billion billion dollars (we’re not converting that to ). That’s about a billion times more expensive than all the Earths economies combined.

The boulderthat the Asteroid Redirect Mission will capture is about 450,000 kilograms(500 tons)and the mission will cost $2.6 billions (1.7 billion). This is the cost of retrieval, so lets assume that the mining cost is equivalent. If the asteroid is completely mined, the material would cost $10,400 (6,900)per kilogram. Of course, it’s unlikely to have 100 percentof any particular metal, so the prices are likely to be a bit skewed. On paper though,it’s possibly comparable.

But dont wave yourlightsabers in celebration just yet. There are many unknown variables when it comes to mining asteroids, which could easily increase the price of materials. On Earth, onlyone in 5,000 to10,000 prospected mines goes into production, and the chances of mining an asteroid might be just as dire. But hey, when it comes to asteroids, never tell us the odds.

[H/T: Wired]

Source: Array

#AmazingWonder
Wonder Of Science

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s